Can AI systems make moral decisions in war?

rtificial intelligence is reshaping how wars are fought. From autonomous drones to AI-powered command-and-control, machines are paving the way for fewer decision-makers in the war room and boots on the ground.

That transformation is already reshaping conflicts by introducing new technologies in Kyiv, Gaza and Tehran. AI-powered interceptor drones in Ukraine. Israel’s AI-enabled target generation used in Gaza. And, most recently, Palantir’s Maven Smart System (MSS) used to identify and strike thousands of targets during the US-Israel war on Iran.


On February 28, the first day of the US-Israel war on Iran, Maven helped to strike more than 1,000 targets, among them an Iranian primary school in Minab where more than 150 people were killed, most of them children. Four months later, the Pentagon’s investigation of the attack remains stalled, with senators demanding answers and Bloomberg reporting that the error traced back to outdated satellite intelligence.

As AI becomes firmly embedded in militaries, the question isn’t just whether these systems can be trusted to make accurate decisions, but whether they can grapple with the moral consequences of the decisions they make.

As part of a series on AI and warfare, Al Jazeera examines if it can successfully replace human decision-makers.

Decision advantage: The rise of AI on the battlefield
Global military expenditure rose 2.9 percent last year to $2.87 trillion. Within that figure, spending on AI for military applications is accelerating fast, projected to grow from $11.7bn to nearly $19.3bn by 2030, according to industry reports.

INTERACTIVE-Global military spending per capita over past 20 years-1777457384

In April, the administration of US President Donald Trump proposed $1.5 trillion in defence spending for the fiscal year beginning in October to build a “dream military” and accelerate the shift from a traditional military-industrial complex to a military-tech one.


The US Pentagon has set its sights on becoming an “AI-first fighting force,” compressing the OODA loop – a decision-making model developed by US Air Force Colonel John Boyd in the late 20th century, built on the premise that whoever moves faster through decisions comes out on top.

Fed continuously with new information, the OODA loop – observe, orient, decide, act – lets commanders decide actions at the latest possible moment, trading certainty for speed and adaptability.

INTERACTIVE OODA-loop-1784569895

Driving the push for speed is Project Maven, Palantir’s flagship AI intelligence platform, paired with Anthropic’s Claude, built to offer a real-time picture of the battlefield.

The OODA loop’s logic was already at work in the drone wars of the 2000s and 2010s, when algorithmic pattern recognition flagged individuals whose behaviour matched a suspicious profile, feeding computationally generated kill lists.

It wasn’t called AI then, but the logic was the same as today’s: find patterns in data faster than a human analyst, and convert them into action.

How does the Maven Smart System work?
To understand what Maven does, it’s worth considering what it has changed. In previous conflicts, such as the 2000s US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, analysts tracked adversarial networks in Excel spreadsheets and PowerPoint slides, logging names and sketching out connections, while kill chains relied on printed dossiers analysed by senior officials. These processes took time.

During Operation Epic Fury, as the current US war on Iran is called, Maven has been used to process thousands of strikes in minutes. Timelines that once took hours or days have been compressed to mere seconds, according to Admiral Brad Cooper, head of US Central Command.

Project Maven was launched in 2017 as the Algorithmic Warfare Cross-Functional Team (AWCFT), to use AI and machine learning to automatically sort through the massive backlog of drone and surveillance footage that the military was collecting but couldn’t fully analyse — from identifying and prioritising the target to selecting the appropriate weapon and finally assessing the battle damage.

Google built computer vision models to analyse drone footage, until it withdrew in 2018 following staff protests in which more than 4,000 employees signed a petition stating that “Google should not be in the business of war.”

Today, more than 20,000 US military personnel use Maven across 35 military software tools and three security classification domains, according to Vice Admiral Frank Whitworth, director of the country’s National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency.

Post by News Desk

  • Related Posts

    Dhaka parliamentary seat 2 will not spare anyone involved in drugs: Aman Ullah Aman.

    Muktar Hossain, Savar: Aman Ullah Aman, Member of Parliament for Dhaka-2, has stated that anyone involved in drug trafficking, extortion, and land grabbing in the Tetuljhora Union of Savar using…

    How 20 minutes of nature can boost your health

    If you’ve ever felt calmer after a walk in the park or a stroll through the woods, it’s not your imagination – it’s biology. Being outdoors can trigger measurable changes…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *